Wednesday, December 31, 2008

NCLB PAPER

Sylvia P.

Blog Contribution

This essay will examine the ‘No Child Left Behind Act’ and how it has been a major instrument in the decline of the United States educational system.  In addition, the act has created a condition in the country, allowing other nations to surpass us in educating its citizenry in Mathematics, Science, Technology, and general literacy.*  According to Gene Gloeckner (Gloechner, 1991),  the United States can not compete in science fields with other nations.   According to the National Science Foundation (NSF), the United States, the country the strongest stand alone nation, ranked 8th out of 15 countries on a 5th grade science achievement test; and depressingly, by the 9th grade, students in the United States ranked 15th out of 16 countries rated.*  Another researcher, Prof. Schmidt (New Educator, 2000) stated,  in science, American fourth grade outperformed all other countries except South Korea  but by the eighth grade, U.S. students barely scored above the international average in science, and in math they only outperform a handful of nations.  Scores for 12th graders were dismal.  The above statements are indicative of an educational decline as children ascend through the grade levels, which is a result of No Child Left Behind Act.  The above results of student performance in the upper grades demonstrate a serious problem with the school system, which has a negative effect on the students.  We must look at these results critically, and pose serious questions about US educational policy, which in turn we must carefully analyze these questions to find a solution. 

The first question I would pose, is there a connection to the No Child Left Behind Act with the high dropout rate in the United States?  According to author Barbara Pytel (Pytel, 2006) during her interview of five hundred high school dropouts, between the ages 16-25 , many reasons were attributed to there lack of interest in learning .   The mixed statistics (as the interviewees were allowed to give more than one answer) revealed 47% said classes were not interesting, 43% had poor attendance, 45% schooling prior to high school did not prepare them for the course work, 69% were not motivated to work hard, 35% were failing, 32% “left to get a job”, 25% left to become parents, 22% left to take care of a relative.  Of those five hundred students interviewed, two-third said, “they would have tried harder if more was expected from them” (Pytel, 2006).  When I see statistics of this nature, I being to wonder, how could such numbers be allowed, a red flag goes up, more questions comes to my mind.  The first  and most important question, why is this happening within the most powerful country?  Or a better question,  how could this be happening in the United States of America?

 

A very interesting study,  “New Study Offers Reality Check:  No Child Left Behind is Increasing Dropout Rates”, described the relationship between dropout rates, minorities, and NCLB.  Researchers at Rice University and University of Texas-Austin (2008) made a suggestion to what the No Child Left Behind Act should be before presenting their findings, “Bush might want to more correctly rename ‘No Child Left Behind’ to ‘Let’s Leave a Lot More Children Behind’ “.  The study concluded, the Texas’ public school accountability system -- which is the model for the national No Child Left Behind Act -- directly contributes to lower graduation rates especially for minorities.  It also concluded, teachers and administrators, within the Texas educational system, are rewarded when minority students drop out; as the schools do not make any efforts to retain the students.  The attitudes of the schools were, “why retain students that make it impossible to comply with NCLB Act (McSpadden-McNeil, 2008).

 

In conclusion,  the accountability system stressed by No Child Left Behind Act,  make teachers the victims; as the teachers are forced to comply with the government’s high-stake accountability requirements. These requirements lead to enormous pressures which feed the high dropout rate among students from poor high school in urban areas (McSpadden-McNeil, 2008).  Furthermore, Professor McSpadden-McNeil  (McSpadden-McNeil, 2008) also stated,  if the test scores don’t raise in a school, the principal could lose his/her job, and/or the schools could lose funding or even be closed.  This study provides an insight into how the ‘quantitative’ No Child Left Behind Act, in which the numerical results alone determine a school’s future,  cause more harm than good.  A ‘qualitative’ approach works best.  To provide a personal example,  my son (a high school dropout) attends Columbia University, he left as the ‘quantitative’ public school system could not harness his potential.  However, he has to work extremely hard to keep up with his peers, especially the international students.  His in-school mentor is from the Ivory Coast in Africa, his descriptions of the educational system, in a war torn land, seem to be more ‘qualitative’ in approach.  His school day started at 7am and ended at 6pm, with no summer vacations in between.  Upon winning a lottery for an educational visa and only four years of residency in the US, he learned English in LaGuardia Community College, excelled and became accepted at Columbia University.  He attributes this quick progress to the quality of education he receive back home.   

 

 

REFERENCES:

The Daily Galaxy: News from Planet Earth & Beyond(February 15, 2008 )New Study Offers Reality Check: No Child Left Behind is Increasing Dropout Rates, referenced from:

http://www.dailygalax.com/my_weblog/2008/02/new-study-offer.html

Gene Gloeckner (Spring 1991);The Integration of Science, Technology, and Mathematics Myth or Dreams ? , referenced from:http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/v2n2/gloeckner.html

New Educator colloege of education (Fall, 2000)referenced from:

 (http://www.msu.edu/neweducator/Falloo/Timss.htm

Barbara Pytel: (November 4, 2006), Dropouts Give Reasons: referenced from:

http://educationalissues.suite.101.com/print_article.cfm/dropouts_give_reasons

 

Saturday, December 6, 2008

Biography

I was born in 1945, in the small eastern European country called Romania. My mother’s parents were from Czechoslovakia and my father’s family was from Hungary. In the house we spoke Hungarian but when my parents did not want my older brother and me to understand they conversed in German or Rumanian.
In 1949, when I was four years old, we escaped from Romania in the middle of the night, walking through three feet of snow over the border to Hungary. My parents did not want to live under the Communist regime, who came as liberators and stayed as conquerors, this after Hitler disseminated the country and all of us who were Jewish! From Hungary we went to Austria where we became Christians in order to immigrate to Argentina—Argentina was not friendly to Jews—but that is where my parents chose to go. That was where my father’s brother lived. The first year we moved a few times and I attended different schools. We finally settled in Buenos Aires.
In High School, after failing frequently in my classes I decided to quit school and turn my “Part Time” job into a “Full Time” work, promising my parents that I would finish school. By the way, diagnosed with ADD, under doctor’s care and medication, I finally fulfilled my promise to my parents and got my GED in the United States when I was 50 years old.
At the tender age of 18, knowing a little of “British” English, my work life started in the United States as a “Counter Girl” in a fast food chain. How I managed to survive, I often wonder! That this country, this people, so different, was a culture shock! To these you must add all my shame, my shame of my scholastic failure, and the shame brought on a feeling of no self-worth!
How I managed to “Step-up-the-ladder”, from a “Counter Girl’ to a lowly position in a Bank, was a stroke of good fortune! A New York Unemployment counselor sent me on an interview to a Bank. But because of prejudice, I wasn’t hired! I was considered as a Puerto Rican (below the salt). This was America?
Finally, a position (higher only to a cleaning man), was mine. I filed cancelled checks – from this, through more, but better menial jobs, rote jobs, some self taught English and working for lower than scale wages; I climbed the ladder (going nowhere). I was still scared, scared that I would be found out that I had lied about my High School Diploma (nonexistent), scared that I could not compete, scared most of all that I was not accepted because I was thought of as a “Puerto Rican” There were other jobs, other disappointments … I was Jewish … I was a foreigner … I was … I was unacceptable as bright as I have been told I was … this did not help how I felt about myself. It was only when I became involved with the Girl Scouts that I began to feel “good” about myself. They did not think of me as a “second class citizen”. They liked me for me. I was not all those awful things I had been told that kept me apart. I was blossoming.
But… and this is what has brought me to today… Chase Bank, where I worked in the accounting department, had an “on site” program with Cornell University, for women employees (…the result of a discriminatory lawsuit against Chase, many years earlier) gave me my first taste of Academia! For me, and the others in the program, it was like a parched person with a long awaited drink of water! I was starting a new beginning!
Hoorah for the chance to learn – me, in the eyes of the world, a lowly uneducated foreigner with a Spanish accent, me, Veronica with ADD, with no self esteem was learning! And this wasn’t for my parents. It was for me, for my self-worth.
Today, as a result of being mislabeled, misjudged and mistreated, today, my self-fulfillment is in teaching, empathizing with those children and adults whose background cultures, languages and religions do not fall into “The Norm” (whatever the “Norm” is)
I was not the “norm” – How I was unaccepted in society has made me more and more cognizant of how teaching must deal with the ever increasing problem of multiculturalism. Today there is only one world – A world of many diverse cultures and backgrounds which, for peace, must be recognized and respected!

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Family Background.

My cultural heritage is a blend of two cultures under the same umbrella (race).  My father was born on the Caribbean Island of Trinidad and Tobago in the British West Indies, off the Venezuelan coast.  He was raised in the city of Port of Spain. My father spoke a little about his life when he was growing up, but what I really do remember him telling me was about the people of his homeland.  The many ethnic groups of Trinidad and Tobago my father spoke of living there on the same island.   There were the Africans, Indians, Venezuelans, Spaniards, French Creoles, Portuguese, Chinese, Britons, Lebanese (I remember the Lebanese because of Danny Thomas), Syrians, Caribs, and Italians.  I can see him pointing on the globe (giving us history lessons) showing which country each group came from.  I recall the stories about the fun he and his brothers had after school, swimming in the Caribbean Sea.  As a young man he worked in the Sugar Cane field cutting down the sugar canes with a machete (the same machete he brought with him to this country).   At that time, agricultural products such as sugar and cocoa influenced the economy.  My father came to this country in 1928, applied and received his Naturalized Certificate of Citizenship on July 5, 1932 (nice date to become a citizen of your new country July 5).  My father was a hard working man.  He worked as a taxi driver and part-time radio and television repairman. My father learned how to repair radios and televisions from a mail order course (the on-line course of the 1950s), he even build a television set which we watched in the kitchen on the worktable he also build.  As a taxi driver, he worked long hours, 6 days a week. I remember him leaving early in the morning before I awoke for school and coming home in the evening after the family (My mother and brother and I) ate dinner, which was at 6:00 everyday.  Sunday was his day off, which made it the best day for the family, not only was Daddy home and we started the day with breakfast and all the fixings fresh orange juice, toast with butter, we did things as a family.  We did Sunday day trips to Manhattan or one of the five boroughs.  We went to the museums, parks, Coney Island and if it was a holiday we went to see the parade for that holiday.

Now let me speak to you of the wonderful woman who give birth to my older brother and me.  My mother was born in Sumter, South Carolina in 1912 was the daughter of a well-known Baptist minister.  She graduated from Morris College with a Bachelor of Arts Degree and had a professional state certificate for teaching the First Grade.   My grandfather had acres of land in two counties.  I remember going south during summer school vacation and picking cotton and other crops that was grown on his farm.  I also remember seeing the WHITES ONLY and COLORED ONLY

water fountains and going to the COLORED SECTION of the only movie house.  I don’t know when my mother came to New York and I don’t know when my father and mother meet and fall in love but I was told that my father went to my mother's home. Hometown and asked her father for her hand in marriage.   My parents cared for my brother and myself very well, I did not know how poor we were, my brother and I didn’t want for anything.   I had all the latest fashions, from the poodle skirt to pleated shirt, I even had cashmere sweater sets, but this was because both my mother and her sister (who also graduated from Morris College) worked as domestic help, cleaning homes of those who could afford to paid for such help.  This was because there weren’t a lot of one room schoolhouse for colored children in the North.  My father and mother wanted both of their children to have a trade; my father wanted me to go to nursing school and my bother to go into the electronic field.  I can’t remember them ever speaking to us about going to college.  Maybe this was because they can’t afford to send us.  But the encouragement and education we received from them was more valuable than anything I received anywhere.  Those

history lessons my father gave me, broadened my perspectives about life.  The lessons about the WHITES ONLY signs from my mother taught me how to tolerate ignorance.  

 When I look at my family history I see   (nothing but) Strong Bloodlines.  African and American Indian, I can’t help to be so very proud of my Heritage.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Empowering Minority College Students for the Workforce

Best practices in training on diversity
“Empowering minority college students for the workforce”

Transcript

INTRODUCTION

Hello everyone. I would like to thank you for tuning in to this pod cast segment entitled “Empowering minority college students for the workforce”. This is the first segment in the Best Practices in Training on Diversity Series. Today’s segment is dear to my heart because I used to work as a Graduate Assistant for Diversity and Multicultural Services in career services at Fordham University. My main responsibility was to research and identify private, corporate companies, not-for-profit organizations and programs seeking to diversify their workplaces and promote these opportunities to the multicultural student population.

HOW DIVERSE IS THE WORKFORCE?

It was predicted that in the United States between 1985 and 2000, 85 per cent of entry-level employees to the workforce would be ‘women, minorities and immigrants’. African-Americans currently comprise 10.1 per cent of the United States' 112.4 million employed workforce. However, the same group has less than 10 percent in managerial and technical positions. (Clements & Jones, 2006) Recently, however, Barrack Obama, an African-American man have been elected to the highest office in the United States.
New Trend in the U.S. Population
By 2050, the U.S. population is expected to increase in great numbers and minority groups will make up nearly half of the population of54%. This is an expected population of 235.7 million of the 439 total populations in the United States. The workforce of working adults would consist of 55% minorities by 2050. (U.S. Census Bureau, 2008) With these growing numbers, being a minority would have to take on a new meaning.

DIVERSITY IN THE WORKPLACE

Diversity is about everyone. It is not about separating groups of people, but bringing people together to achieve the goals of the corporate organization. This is achieved when individuals have the opportunity to fairly demonstrate their unique strengths and contributions. The competition within all organizations today is to find talented and skilled workers. Diversity is important for recruiters because it provides a rich pool of applicants that can bring in new ideas, points of views and resources. With the mixture of different people and ideas, conflict is bound to arise; however when managed correctly it can actually become what is called “ creative abrasion”, where opposing viewpoints compliment each other. Mike Bagshaw, in his article entitled “Is diversity diverse? A positive training approach” discussed the four C’s of working with diversity to have effective immediate change in employees. In summary it is about eliminating assumptions and unprofessional conduct to having respect. (Bagshaw, 2004)

“Utilizing common denominators to empower yourself as a minority in the work place.”

The need for affinity groups, mentors, networking and professional associations. (Expanded on Audio version. Add lib.)

Vision/Future

What can be done to take diversity career initiatives to the next level on predominately white colleges and universities? I would like to offer the following recommendations.

Create a Diversity Leadership Luncheon Summit to be held during the spring semester in April. The purpose of the Diversity Leadership Luncheon Summit is to be the launching pad of university students into the workforce for the upcoming summer. The event would include an interactive workshop and presentation from a dynamic facilitator (invited guest who can be an author etc.) to stretch students to another level. The duration of the event should be no longer than three hours.
Advisory Board for Diversity Initiatives This would be a board consisting of about five to seven professionals among diverse industries such as Business/ Finance, Education, Social services, Arts/Entertainment, Communications and Media, Health/Sciences, and Technology. Preferably participants would be successful university alumni or supporters who believe in the mission and vision of diversity initiatives. The benefit for the advisor is an invitation to special diversity functions, and the Diversity Leadership Luncheon, with the personal satisfaction of making a difference. The benefit to the students is a committed resource and network of individuals from various industries and etc.

Partnership with Office of Multicultural Affairs-Create a workshop that is career and diversity related that could be presented on campus to build a bridge and relationship between both departments.

References
Bagshaw, M. (2004). Is diversity diverse? A positive training approach. Industrial and Commercial Training, 36, 153-157.
Clements, P., & Jones, J. (2006). The diversity-training handbook: A practical guide to understanding and changing attitudes (2nd ed.). London, England & Philadelphia, PA: Kogan Page Limited.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2008, August 14, 2008). An older and more diverse nation by mid-century [Press release]. Retrieved from www.census.gov

Positive Impacts of Imigration

Welcome to the multicultural hour, were I my self Amber Pina, a professor of multiculturalism at New York University, occupy this hour to discuss Multiculturalism and the spiral effects that it has on learners and educators. Today I’m going to play around with a bit of a different format; one of my current student Karen D’lahoz will be interviewing me as part of her final project. During this interview I reveal some of the most transforming changes that happened as a result of my family’s migration to the United States from the Dominican Republic. I will also reflect on my cultural heritage and the cultural marriage of values that happens to every immigrant during the transitional period of their migration.
Karen: How old were you, when you and your family migrated to the United States?
Amber: I was nine years old, turning ten on December 11, 1990. We migrated in June of 1990, to Clifton, New Jersey. My family consists of both set of parents, two brothers and myself.
Karen: What grade were you in?
Amber: I was entering the six grade that coming September.
Karen: Were your parent’s college graduates?
Amber: My parents were both college graduates. My father was a lawyer, with a successful private practice in the heart of Santo Domingo, the capital of the Dominican Republic. My mother, who had also attained a law degree, was a judge for the civil court, in Santo Domingo.
Karen: In the Dominican Republic were you in private school or public school?
Amber: Private School, my brothers and I were in a private catholic school?
Karen: Can you describe how was your life growing up in the Dominican Republic?
Amber: My life growing up in the Dominican Republic was very colorful. My parents kept us very busy as children, with after school activities. My scheduled was filled with ballet classes for six years, swimming classes for five, art classes and I took after school English courses at the Dominico English institute. Education was very important for both of my parents. I’m filled with fond memories of my childhood back home, my brothers and I use to be very close. Our weekends were often spend at the beach house, and family vacations were very present during my childhood.
Karen: Your story it’s different than the immigrations stories that we have become so familiar with, you know the one’s of hardship and struggles, filled with the illusion of coming to the land of opportunity, to conquer the American dream. Your story is different your parents had created a comfortable life for you and your brothers. Your parents were both successful in their profession, what was the motive for the migration to the U.S? What were your parents trying to achieve or expect from this move?
Amber: The main reason for the move was that there was a new government taking over, you see the Dominican Republic is a third world country, anytime there is a shift in government, the new government brings in new individuals to work to fill different positions, which meant my mother would be left without employment. Without my mothers income we would not be able to keep our current lifestyle, so my parents decided that in the U.S. we would have better opportunities. My parent’s expectations varied, I truly believe that my parents were not fully aware of the changes that we would endure as a family in the years to come.
Karen: In your opinion what was one of the first obstacle that your parents faced in the United States as immigrants?
Amber: The first and hardest obstacle that my parents faced was their status shift. They were respected professionals back home; here in the United States their education was useless. Unless they returned to school all over again their degrees were worth nothing, and with three kids to support in a new country, school was not an option. This was very difficult on both of my parents, but especially on my father. I believe his ego could not handle it, to work in a factory making pennies, to endure discrimination it was too much for him. The devaluation of my father’s persona, was something he could not come to terms with. He felt was too smart for these factory jobs and working like a dog, after living a life of fancy cars and beach houses he could not come to terms with this new found reality. I believe that my mother also suffered from this status shift, but since my father could not endure it, she suffered in silence. My father is a very proud man, he could not perceive that his wife was working at a local McDonald’s, which led to fights between my parents, were my father would often put my mother down and eventually it ended with divorce.
Karen: How did this migration affect you?
Amber: I remember the day I left, like it was yesterday. I didn’t want to come to the U.S., as a family we had vacation in the U.S. many times. I like my life in Santo Domingo, and I love my country and my people. This migration has affected me in so many ways first as a girl, to enter a new school system, with no friends. I remembered being ridicule for my clothes, and also feeling puzzled because my clothes were trendy in Santo Domingo; but not good enough for the U.S. I always remembered this moment, and I like to call it the beginning of my individuality. This is were I understood I’m in new territory and they are different ways of doing things, and that is also were I became an observer. I observed everything and everyone. Second as a teenager, I was not allowed to do half of the things my American girlfriends were doing. The Dominican Republic is controlled by Catholicism; I was raised as a Catholic. My father was extremely strict; I had to find ways to introduce my parents to the new culture. This was extremely difficult, my parents wanted to keep things exactly how they were back home, but this proof to be impossible. They had placed their children in a new culture, yet wanted them to stay true to the old one. As woman it still affects me to this present day, I have come across numerous outdated beliefs that don’t serve me anymore. This move also taught me the power of conditioning, and that one has to stay very aware to be able to stay true to who you are.
Karen: Did you encountered any changes in your parent’s interest in your education?
Amber: Oh yes, their interest in my education diminished. They had very little involvement in my education due to the language barrier. My parents were to busy working odd end jobs to attend after school meetings with teachers, they also stop checking my report card.
Karen: What impact did this have in your education?
Amber: Looking back, it did. In high school, I did the minimum to get by. I never joined any after school program or played sports. Instead, I started working my freshman year; once I started to make my own money education became secondary to me. If my parents were more involve in my education and more supportive, I would have probably graduated with numerous scholarships. It was difficult because I could not speak to my parents about my education, because they did not understand. I got my information from my peers and made decisions regarding my education with no guidance.
Karen: What about any of those after school activity that you were part of in the Dominican Republic did you maintain them here?
Amber: My mother till this day carries huge regret for not being able to keep me in dancing. I really loved dancing, but we didn’t have the money or the knowledge of how to find a dancing school back then. My after school activity became cooking diner for my father and my brothers. Due to the fact that my mother worked nights, and I was the girl of the house cooking duties failed on my shoulders. Now I can see that those afternoon spend in my kitchen, served me as an informal way of learning a new skill. I can proudly say that I’m a good cook, and my cooking has evolve through out the years, to what I like to call multicultural cooking. I stated cooking traditional Dominican dishes, and through out the years I have added dishes from various cultures.
Karen: As an educator and a parent what tips can you give to immigrant parents that can enhanced their children education?
Amber: It’s not hard, be present in school activities. If there is a language barrier, one can ask for translators the school will be more than happy to provide one. If a parent can not make it to parent conference due to a schedule conflict, ask for a phone appointment, or send a written notice to reschedule for a better time. Ask your child to translate what their learning, and ask them to teach you things, such as how to properly pronounce a word or use the computer. Ask questions, a parent’s involvement has great positive impact in our children’s education.
Karen: You speak of a marriage of values, can you please explain this?
Amber: A marriage of values is something that every immigrant deals with. As daily interaction begins to happen with another culture, one is exposed to a new culture that consists of new values. The more interaction that an individual encounters with a new culture, the faster a marriage between values starts to take place. Immigrants often come to the realization that their old cultural values are no longer serving them while involve in a new experience. This realization leads to both the old value being replaced by new ones, or a marriage of an old value and a new value. For example, I was raised as a catholic, that value has now been replaced with spirituality. I no longer considered my self a catholic, but yet I still practice some catholic traditions like celebrating Christmas. This what I refer to as marriage of values, is a compromised an immigrant is faced with in a daily basis.
Karen: Well, now one last question, before time is up?
Amber: Sure.
Karen: What are some cultural aspects that the Dominican Republic is known for?
Amber: Well we are an island in the Caribbean; we are known to be happy laid back people. Funny, but the first university in the world was first founded in the Dominican Republic, and education is very important for my people. My country is mainly known for tourism, and white sand beaches. To me is more than a white sand beach, it represents the beginning of a journey. The beginning of this immigrant woman; that sits in front of you; and the end of that shelter catholic girl. I use to wonder who I would be, if we had never moved. I no longer wonder, I’m grateful for all the different perspectives my cultural background has offered me.
This is the end of our show I hope that you have enjoyed it. I would like to live you with a bit of advice for all the immigrant learners and educators that are listening, stay flexible, never rigid. Make room for new ideas, perspectives and values and observe how full your life becomes full of moments one never thought possible. For the immigrant parents that are listening, please embrace positive characteristics of different cultures, not only those this support the growth of your child, it also keeps you as a parent an active learner.
References:
Gollinick and Chinn: Multicultural Education in a Pluralistic Society, eight edition.

My Cultural Heritage History

My cultural heritage history starts in a little town called Belsito, in the region of Calabria, located in Southern Italy. The year is 1929 and the fascists regime has ruled in Italy since 1922. My great grandfather and great grandmother on my mother’s side, Serafina and Vincent, are struggling to make ends meet. Serafina is a homemaker and Vincent works as an ironworker in the city of Cosenza. Unfortunately, taxes are being raised and the new government is becoming less attractive to Serafina and Vincent. Both have family members that have immigrated to the United States, which they know as “the Land of Opportunity.” In October of 1922, Serafina and Vincent decide to move to America with their three sons.
My great grandparents on my mother’s side moved to the United States from Calabria in 1922. Calabria is a region located South of Naples, better known for its location at the “toe” of the Italian peninsula. Calabria officially became part of Italy when the country was unified in 1861. Shortly after, the Italian government began to raise taxes and forbid people to use the land they depended on. When the Fascist regime took control in 1922, many people supported the regime, while others fled the country (Il Circolo Calabrese). My great grandparents chose to leave because they believed better opportunities existed for them in the United States, especially financial opportunities. Today, Calabria is known for its beautiful beaches and coastline, which has caused a steady increase in tourism over the years. Like my great grandparents, many of the people in Calabria worked the land or hand manual labor jobs in the biggest nearby city. When my great grandparents moved to the United States, they had relatives that had already moved to North America, to places such as Chicago and Philadelphia in the United States, and Toronto in Canada. When they arrived in the United States, they settled in a predominantly Italian section of Northeast Philadelphia where some of their relatives had immigrated to previously. Serafina and Vincent had three sons when they moved and then had one more son and two daughters, one of whom would be my grandmother, in Philadelphia. Serafina stayed at home with the children and did not pursue any type of work. Vincent became a full time postal worker and helped in his brother’s butcher shop. Neither my great grandmother or grandfather attended any type of schooling, nor did they learn English. They moved to a predominantly Italian neighborhood and never had to learn English or were presented with the opportunity to do so.
My great grandparents had six children. None of them attended school past the sixth grade and all of them worked in manual labor jobs or joined the military. Occupations they held included barber, butcher, stone mason, shoemaker, crop picker, factory worker, seamstress and sailor in the Navy. My grandmother’s main role in the family was to take care of her brothers, which included cooking, cleaning, laundry, and maintaining the house. She also worked as a seamstress in a factory during the Great Depression and helped in her brother’s barber shop. In 1951, she met and married my grandfather and in 1954, my mother was born. My grandfather was also from Calabria and moved to the United States in 1925. His parents both passed away shortly after his arrival. They, too, settled in Philadelphia. My mother was an only child, born and raised in Philadelphia. She was the first in her family to attend high school, graduate from college, and receive a Master’s degree.
My father’s grandparents lived in Naples, Italy. Like Calabria, Naples also became part of Italy in 1861 as part of the Italian unification. It is located in Southern Italy, along the Eastern coast. Although the people of Naples did not rebel against Italian fascism prior to World War II, they were the first to rise up against German military occupation during World War II. Naples is famously known as the traditional home of pizza, which is where it originated. Both of my great grandparents were from Naples, where they lived down the street from each other. They both moved to the United States in 1927 with their families. Their families also had relatives in the United States and thought they could better achieve financial security if they left Italy and moved to the United States. Both of my great grandparents moved to New York and left shortly after to reside permanently in Elizabeth, New Jersey. My father’s grandmother was a seamstress and his grandfather worked for Exxon. When they arrived in the United States, my great grandfather could not find work because of his status as an immigrant. In order to sound more “American,” he removed the last vowel from his last name. My grandmother was one of four children, one of whom became a politician in Elizabeth. My father’s great aunts and uncles were more educated and his mother and father were both highly educated. Many of his aunts and uncles, including his mother and father, graduated from high school and went on to college. While some of them did have blue collar jobs, most of them did go to school and received an education. My father’s family still resides in Elizabeth, New Jersey.
Knowing and understand one’s own cultural heritage is an important aspect in defining and developing our identities. The culture that we were raised in forms a large part of our identities and influences who we are and who we become. By understanding our culture, we are able to form better understandings of ourselves. In the classroom, it is essential that we, as educators, understand the cultural history of our students. Not only can this knowledge help us to better understand our students, but we can also use this knowledge to create a curriculum that is culturally relevant and meaningful for the students.



Works Cited
Tarantin, Jack. Personal interview. 22 Nov. 2008.
Il Circolo Calabrese. 22 Nov. 2008. Retrieved from http://www.circolocalabrese.org/
Naples. 22 Nov. 2008. Retrieved from www.italyguides.it/us/napoli/naples.htm

The Hours Movie Review

“I am living a life I have no wish to live…how did this happen?” (Virginia Woolf, played by Nicole Kidman, in The Hours Motion Picture). In the 2002 Academy Award winning movie, The Hours, the final years of prominent twentieth century author, Virginia Woolf, are captured. In particular, the workings of her masterpiece book, Mrs. Dalloway, are depicted and creatively intertwine with the lives of two other women in the film. The director, Stephen Daldry, and producers, Scott Rudin and Robert Fox, based this movie on the Pulitzer Prize winning novel by Michael Cunningham. Through this story we witness the lives of three separate, but similar women living in different eras. Each faces complexities from within that they ultimately struggle to solve in their individual way. In general, The Hours is a powerful film that portrays the expected role of women in society, while also illustrating the desire and need for some women to break away from the believed cultural norms.
The movie tracks three women through a day in their lives. The first story focuses on Virginia Woolf in England in1923 as she begins to write her novel, Mrs. Dalloway. The second narrative follows Laura Brown, a Californian housewife who is reading Mrs. Dalloway in 1951. The third account details the life of Clarissa Vaughn in 2001 as she basically lives the life of Mrs. Dalloway from Virginia Woolf’s novel in New York City. Throughout the film, clips of these three women’s days alternate back and forth.
The character of Virginia Woolf, played by Nicole Kidman, is an extremely gifted writer who is fighting depression, while writing one of her final novels, Mrs. Dalloway, in the 1920s. She is living under doctor supervision in Richmond, England, a suburb of London, due to her two previous attempts to commit suicide. Her husband, Leonard Woolf, and her family constantly worry and look out for her well being. As the day unfolds, Virginia’s writing is well underway when she receives a visit from her sister, Vanessa Bell, and her sister’s three children. During this time, Virginia contemplates the events in her book and determines that a character in the novel must die. Also, the audience begins to recognize the close relationship she shares with Vanessa and even witnesses a passionate kiss between them. Moments afterwards Virginia asks her sister, “Do you think I may one day escape?” This question exposes her intricate feelings of confinement and inability to live her life freely. In the end, Virginia successfully commits suicide by drowning herself in a nearby river. She leaves a heartfelt letter for her husband that explains the agony she continually felt and thanks him for his unfaltering goodness.
Julianne Moore plays the role of Laura Brown, a wife and mother who is expecting her second child in California post World War II. As her day sets out, the film shows her inability to get out of bed and face the world on her husband’s birthday. She seems totally disconnected from her life and deeply interested in Virginia Woolf’s book, Mrs. Dalloway. When she finally gets out of bed she sees her husband, Dan Brown, off to work and plans to bake a cake with her son, Richard Brown, for her husband’s birthday. After failing at her first attempt, she proceeds to bake a second cake. Then, her friend Kitty stops by and together they share an intimate moment. It is in that scene where Laura realizes that she is not the women her family and friends think she is. She wonders why her war hero husband made the mistake of choosing her, a shy lonely girl who loved to read in high school, when he could have had any girl he wished. Following these negative inner thoughts, she drops her son at her friend’s home and checks into a hotel where she reads Mrs. Dalloway and plans to kill herself. Although she does not go through with it, she ultimately abandons her family after she gives birth to her daughter. Later on in the movie when she describes that segment of her life she movingly exclaims that, “it was death, I chose life.”
The character of Clarissa Vaughn, played by Meryl Streep, is a modern day lesbian editor who is deeply devoted to caring for Richard, her friend and past lover who is dying of AIDS. Throughout her day she is preparing a party that she is hosting to honor Richard for winning a poetry prize for his life’s work. When Clarissa first visits his apartment in the morning, the audience takes notice that Richard calls her Mrs. Dalloway. He plainly says, “Oh Mrs. Dalloway…always giving parties to cover the silence.” This statement along with the events occurring through the day, expose Clarissa’s feelings of confliction. She questions her life decisions including her life with Sally, her lover for ten years, and she wonders what her life may have been like if she were still with Richard. In one of the final scenes, the party is cancelled when Richard unexpectedly commits suicide by jumping out of the window of his apartment. It seemed as though he felt burdensome to Clarissa; he wanted her to focus on her own life without having to constantly care for him. In the conclusion, both Clarissa and Mrs. Dalloway finally overcome their emotions and take comfort in the idea that life does have meaning.
During this movie, several powerful themes emerge. One in particular focuses on the constraint of societal roles on each of the woman. They seem to wrestle with the cultural expectations placed on them solely because of their gender and they also tend to sacrifice their individual identities to make others happy. Although all three women faced these similar challenges, they dealt with them differently depending on the time period in which they lived. Virginia Woolf was not considered the typical English wife. Her inabilities to take control of her own life along with her lesbian tendencies drove her to commit suicide. Conversely, Laura Brown was living the American dream in suburban California with a loving family, beautiful home, and nice car. However, this perfect life was all just a lie to her. It was not at all what Laura had wanted, but during that time in history she, like Virginia, was unable to voice her opinion and speak out about her desperation. So Laura dealt with it by fleeing. On the other hand, Clarissa Vaughn was living in modern day as a domestic lesbian woman. Her role as a homosexual in society was more accepted, yet she was still conflicted. The audience caught her wondering whether or not she was in love with Richard, Sally, or both. In other words, Clarissa still seemed to question her sexuality and life right up until she got closure when Richard died and she began to better understand and love herself, her life, and her hours.
As a prospective adolescent teacher, I recognize that the The Hours movie carries various implications for society and more specifically for education. All students in a classroom, male or female and homosexual, heterosexual, or bisexual, are protected under Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments (Gollnick & Chinn, 2009). Teachers are supposed to provide a nonsexist education that does not discriminate or stereotype any student based on his/her gender or sexual orientation. Accepting all learners for who they are, not casting societal judgments on them, and supporting their development in all aspects including their identity is greatly important. Further, teachers must also react appropriately if students are disrespecting each other in any way. Overall, educators, students and society in general should become aware of the constraints they tend to place on individuals in differing cultural groups. Through The Hours movie, one sees just how suffocating and overpowering these pressures can be on the twisted lives of three human beings in the twentieth century.



References

Gollnick, D. M. &Chinn, P.C. (2009). Multicultural Education in a Pluralistic Society (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

Rudin, S. & Fox, R. (Producers), & Daldry, S. (Director). (2002). The hours [Motion Picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures and Miramax Films.

Monday, November 24, 2008

My Slovenian Heritage

Growing up, I never really paid a lot of attention to my heritage. Since moving to New York for school, I have noticed that family origin is much more important in the North than in the South where I grew up. In high school, it was very unusual for someone to ask me where my family was from, but during my first few years in New York, I was asked that by almost every person that I met. Unfortunately for a long time I did not know a lot about my family’s past. We believe that my Dad’s side of the family is from Ireland, although as far as I know we do not have any actual proof of that. We believe my last name- Meneilly- used to be McNeil or McNeilly and that it was changed at some point. We know very little about when they came to the United States or what caused them to leave Ireland.
We know much more about my mom’s side of the family and their immigration into the United States because she was with them when they immigrated. She was only about five years old, so she does not remember a lot of it, but she has still experienced it firsthand. Her family was originally from Austria-Hungary. Ethnically, they were German, but they lived in a Slovak area of what was at the time Yugoslavia. Their forefathers left Austria-Hungary immediately after the Protestant Reformation because they were being persecuted for their Catholic beliefs. At the beginning of World War II her parents, my grandparents, lived on a very small farm in which they were barely able to provide for themselves. The farm was part of a small village; their house had no running water and no electricity. They grew or raised most of the food that they ate; the animals stayed in the house and the field was farther away. They spent most of their time during the war on the farm because it was very dangerous to leave the area because they could be shot by either the Germans or the rebel Yugoslavians.
In 1943 after World War II had been going on around them for four years, my mom Helga Juran was born. Throughout the German occupation, the Juran family was treated very well because they spoke German. Around April 1945, the Russians began to conquer the Germans in Yugoslavia. At this time, a group of German soldiers came to the farm. To the family’s surprise, the Germans told them that they were retreating from the Russians, and that they were afraid that the Russians would kill the family because they spoke German instead of Yugoslavian. The soldiers took my grandmother, who was pregnant at the time, and my mom from the farm and put them on a train. They left my grandfather and his mother behind because they wanted to save the woman and children first. While on the train, the small amount of food that they took with them fell between the seats, and they were unable to retrieve it. They went without food for the 24 hours that they were on the train. This is one of the few vivid memories my mom has of their journey. When the train finally stopped, they found themselves in Austria where they were left with no provisions or instructions. The group that they were with began walking until they came to a deserted prisoner of war camp. They used the shelter that they found there to start their own displaced persons camp. Eventually, the British troops came to the camp, and they began using at as an official displaced persons camp. In June, my aunt, Elfrieda Juran was born.
Meanwhile, my grandfather and his mother did not know what to do. If they stayed on the farm, they might never see their family again, but if they left, they would risk their lives. Eventually, they decided to gather some supplies and hide in the forest until nightfall. Each night, they would walk west, away from the Russian troops; during the day they would hide in the forests because the Yugoslav partisans would shoot everyone that they saw. After several weeks and about 125 miles, they crossed the border to Austria and safety. They went from camp to camp asking for Hedwig and Helga. Approximately five weeks after the soldiers came to the farm, my grandmother and her two small children were standing in a food line when Helga shouted, “Daddy!” Hedwig looked up and saw her husband. The reunited family lived in the displaced persons camp for about two more months. After that, Joseph, Hedwig, and Fanny got jobs working on a large estate in Austria. My Aunt Lilly was born there in December 1946. Finally, the family was able to immigrate to the United States because my grandmother had a relative in New York that sponsored them. On July 17, 1947 they arrived on Ellis Island.
Once my mom’s family arrived in the United States they continued to struggle. My mom got sick not long after arriving and spent a couple months in the hospital. While there, the nurses taught her English, which was especially important because speaking German was extremely frowned upon at the end of World War II. My grandfather found work in a beer factory, where he continued to work until his retirement many years later. My grandmother found a job in a nearby knitting factory and also struggled with raising three small girls. After a few years, my grandparents were able to achieve the American dream. By the time I knew them, they were completely “American”. Although they were never wealthy by any means, they had bought they own house in Queens, were able to provide for themselves, and sent all three of their children to college.
“The Slovenes, a Slavic people, migrated southwestward across present-day Romania in about the sixth century A. D., and settled in the Julian Alps” (Yugoslavia: The Slovenes, p 1). The Slovene language, Slovenian, was common to the peasant people; the upper class spoke German or Italian. “The Slovene economic links with Germany and Italy strengthened in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and living conditions improved” (Yugoslavia: The Slovenes, p. 1). Over the next century, the Slovenes built themselves up to the middle class and created a true sense of pride and national identity (Yugoslavia: The Slovenes, p. 2). The Slovenes were “the most westernized but least numerous of the Slavs” and were “…the most economically advanced of the South Slavs at the close of the nineteenth century (Yugoslavia: The Slovenes, p. 1). After the dismantling of Yugoslavia, the Slovenes created Slovenia. It’s “level of prosperity remained higher than that of the other Yugoslav republics throughout the socialist era….and Slovenia had the highest proportion of its population employed in industry, the lowest rate of unemployment, and the highest value of exports per capita” (Yugoslavia: The Slovenes, p. 2). The Slovene culture that surrounded my mom and her family explains the strong will that they showed during the war. Slovenes worked hard and succeeded in their activities; my family persevered through low food supplies, gunfights, separation, and immigration to start a new life. The resilient culture that surrounded them influenced them in their lifestyle, activities, and emotional characteristics.
The Soviet Offensive that caused my mom’s family to have to move began in July 1943 and continued through May 1945. With the aid of the United States and the United Kingdom, “the Red Army…created a very large force that the Soviets were able to convert from defense at Kursk to offense almost immediately” (McDonald, 2000, p. 1). During the next two years, the Soviets systematically moved across the Eastern Front and into German territory. In 1944, “a forced march through the mountains of Yugoslavia….was completed in mid-November. On September 28, the Red Army began its liberation of Yugoslavia and marched on the capital of Belgrade on October 20” (McDonald, 2000, p. 2).
There were approximately 1,500,000 to 2,000,000 displaced persons at the end of World War II; many of them were Jews that had just been released from concentration camps. The rest of the people “…refused or could not return to their prewar homes” (Menszer, 2000, p. 1). At the end of the war there were over 45,000 displaced persons housed in Austria alone. The accommodations in each camp differed, but many “…consisted of standard prefabs or barracks…” (Milac, 2003, p. 1). Many refugees were forced to beg at nearby farms, and, in desperate situations, steal from the fields. Most camps were fenced off from the outside world. People with trades could find work on the army base, which provided a small income for families (Stabins, p. 1). Many displaced persons did not wish to return to their former lands or even to their native country; there were too many bad memories for them there. In 1948 the United States passed the Displaced Persons’ Act and “between 1945 and 1952 approximately 400,000 displaced persons immigrated to the United States” (Menszer, 2000, p. 1). The conditions that the Juran family lived through during their short stay in displaced persons camp were not easy. They fought through hunger, poorly constructed shelter, and overcrowding until they eventually began a new life living the American dream.





Library of Congress. (n.d.). Library of Congress country studies. Yugoslavia: The Slovenes. Retrieved November 14, 2008 from www.lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+yu0015).
McDonald, Jason. (2000). The soviet offensive, July 1943-May 1945. Retrieved November 15, 2008 from www.worldwar2database.com/html/sovietoffensive.htm.
Meneilly, Helga (2008) Personal communication.
Menszer, John. (2000). Encyclopedia: Displaced persons. Retrieved November 16, 2008 from www.holocaustsurvivors.org/cgi-bin/data.show.pl?di=record&da=encyclopedia&ke=51.
Milac, Metod. (2003). Displaced persons camps: St. Veit an der Glan Camp, the Kellerberg Camp, Graz, and Studentenlager Hochsteingasse. Retrieved November 18, 2008 from www.dspcamps.org/dpcamps.graz.html.
Stabins, Andrew. (n.d.). Glasenbach and Rauchenbuchler/Rachenbichl displace person camps. Retrieved November 15, 2008 from www.dpcamps.org/dpcamps/glasenbach.html.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Impact of Heritage on My Culture

Understanding one’s ethnicity plays a large role in helping an individual understand his or her background and culture. I have always known that I was unique in the sense that I am 100% Polish; however, I’ve never really understood the impact that my heritage has had on my way of life.
Poland is a country located in central Europe, bordered by Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Russia. It is a country in which agriculture plays a big role in its economy. Approximately 35% of the population lives in rural areas. It also has a wealth of natural resources, including coal, sulfur, salt and copper. Poland is also considered to be an example of a successful transition from a Communist to market economy. It was under Communist rule until 1989, and then shifted into a democratic government. It is also known as the location for the Auschwitz internment camps during World War II. The majority of the population is Catholic, and one important figure within the Polish Catholic church is Pope John Paul II.
All my relatives, including my parents, have been born and raised in Poland. My mother and father both immigrated to the United States when they were each eighteen years old. When speaking to my parents, they have both told me that they chose to leave behind their families and the only way of life they knew, to pursue a better future for themselves and for their children. Since both my mother and father grew up on farms, the pressure to work was constantly applied. As children of farmers, education was placed on the back burner. Neither of my parents could fathom living the rest of their lives like that, knowing there were better opportunities elsewhere. When they were growing up, Poland was still under Communist rule, which is another reason why they chose to leave. So when both turned eighteen years old, my mother and father chose to immigrate to America.
My father studied English in high school so he was able to communicate with people once he arrived in the U.S. When he arrived, he lived in Yonkers, N.Y. with some relatives. However, he worked hard to improve his language skills by reading a lot of books and translating Polish texts to English. My father said it was difficult to find a good job at first because many employers were hiring people who were able to fluently speak English and had a college degree. His first job was working in a junkyard, taking apart cars. He then worked in a woodworking store, finishing furniture for a couple of years before working as a security guard in NYC. During that time, he decided to go to a trade school, where he studied for an engineering degree. After graduating, he obtained a job as an operating engineer in a commercial building in Manhattan. My father said that he initially faced prejudice at his job because his co-workers harbored resentment that a foreigner could obtain a good job. He would often be singled out to do the more tedious tasks, even when he was promoted. Although my father never formally graduated from college, through hard work and dedication, he was able to get a respected and well-paying job. During this time, his English became fluent and today he does not have an accent.
When she arrived in Elizabeth, NJ, my mother lived with relatives who spoke only Polish inside the home for about a year. During this time, she worked in their deli business, so she was not able to acquire any English skills. It wasn’t until she got her own apartment and took an ESL night class that she began learning English. She also worked as a housekeeper in a hotel for a short time, which also helped improve her English skills. Since she had no college education, it was difficult for her to find a good job. When she married my father, she decided to be a stay at home mother. When my sister and I entered school, she decided to take classes at the local community college to further improve her English. Several years ago, she began working for as technical operator in the packaging department of a pharmaceutical company.
Both my parents have achieved personal success. They have served as an inspiration to me throughout my life. Although they have lived in this country for over thirty years, they have never forgotten their roots and have encouraged me to embrace my heritage as well. My parents still speak Polish at home, and when I was a child, I was also able to fluently communicate with them in Polish. However, as I entered school, I was socialized into the dominant culture and have since lost my ability to speak two languages fluently. On special occasions, my mother will cook traditional Polish dishes, such as pierogies and kielbasa. Growing up, my parents took my sister and I to a local festival sponsored by a Polish organization that celebrates Polish culture. It was an opportunity for me to learn the traditional songs, dances, and plays. Through my parents, I have been able to experience Polish culture firsthand, and it has enabled me to take pride in my heritage. I can honestly say that I am proud to be Polish!

Friday, November 21, 2008

critical project 3

Critical project 3


Hi everyone my name is Diana Ritchie I was born in Iran in late 1978, just before the Iranian Revolution. Before the revolution Iran was somewhat of a democracy. During the time of Reza Shah Pahlavi, the king of Iran at the time, Iran was an “indispensable ally to the west” (Iran Chamber Society, 2008). The shah also stood for many other things such as voting rights for women and the elimination of illiteracy in the country (Iran Chamber Society, 2008). Iran was a peaceful country that loved and respected its citizens.
In April 1979 the Ayatollah Khomeini came into power. The shah had been exiled and the country was in turmoil. Our peaceful country was no longer peaceful. My mum told me many stories of how the streets were in chaos. People were fighting everywhere. People were divided by those who followed the shah and those who were happy with the new Islamic republic. For us it was hard because we were not Muslim. As Jews we now stood out in this new republic.
I was born into a somewhat privileged family. My family was a large one as were most Persian families. My grandfather was one of thirteen children. My family followed Persian Jewish traditions. However, they always saw themselves first as Iranians than as Jews. Children would normally follow in the footsteps of their parents. Boys would run their fathers businesses once their fathers had grown old. Girls were brought up to know how to run the households and look after children. All children in my family were educated although they were never pushed toward being doctors or lawyers like most others; they knew that they had to run the family business. My family mostly dealt in Persian rugs and antiques this was considered a very traditional and prestigious job.
During 1979 most of my family members managed to flee Iran. We were all scattered between England, America and Israel. Most of my family members managed to bring a little something with themselves so they would be able to get started in their new countries. All of my family members went into the carpet or antique business as this is all that they knew. But it all paid off in the end.
Persian rugs are seen as a sign of wealth. Kings and noblemen looked at them as a sign of prestige and distinction (persianruggallery.com). Knowing Persian rugs is not an easy occupation however I have been lucky to be able to learn a few things about rugs. Persian rugs are extremely expensive item as are antiques. My family set up Persian their own rug stores as well as dealing with auctioneers such as Christies and Sotheby’s. They would also supply to big department stores such as Bloomingdales. This is how my family was able to make a new life for themselves in their new countries. They took family traditions and lifestyles and continued with it in the new land.
Now a day’s one can find Persian rugs anywhere, even Ikea. Although, good quality rugs are still hard to come by they can be found in specialty rugs stores such as those my family runs. They can also be found in place like Christies and Sotheby’s like mentioned before. So sometimes it pays to listen to what your parents may be teaching you as it could end up as your future job. I am very proud to be part of this tradition and be able to spot out good rugs or antiques when necessary.









References

Iran Chamber Society. Retrieved November 21st 2008.
http://www.iranchamber.com/history/mohammad_rezashah/mohammad_rezashah.php.

PersianRugsGallery.com. Retrieved November 21st 2008.
http://www.persianruggallery.com/History.htm

Thursday, November 20, 2008

From Sea to Shining Sea: A Journey to America

Thalia Ann Bethel
EDGE 6101
Critical Reflection Project #3

From Sea to Shining Sea: A Journey to America

When I was young girl, I wasn’t familiar with my family history until my tenth birthday. I always knew my mother’s family and my father’s family looked completely different from one another because of their skin color. On my father’s side of the family, all my relatives are very light skin and could pass for white. However, my mother’s relatives are either tan or very dark skin, but could only pass as black. The main reason for this color difference was my parent’s place of origin. Both of my parents have West Indian ancestry in their families, but since the Caribbean is a diversified place there isn’t any segregation of color. After my tenth birthday, I decided to ask my mother about my family history and where my father and she came from. She was born in Birmingham, England and my father originated from the island of Grenada. To explain her heritage, my mother decided to begin with her parents’ ancestry and their journey to the United States which connected her and my father’s relationship.
On May 2nd, 1955 McKenon Francis, my grandfather, arrived in Dover, England after a two week voyage from his native island of St. Kitts and Nevis. The voyage to England took two weeks because it was cheaper to take a ship than an airplane. The ship voyage included coming from St. Kitts and Nevis to arriving in Montserrat. From Montserrat, the ship went to the Mediterranean and arrived in Italy where my grandfather had to take a train to his destination. He described his experience as “an uplifting and exciting travel to a new world.” McKenon realized that life in Dover was different from St. Kitts and Nevis because he had to work a full day, where on the island he was able to work early and relax for the rest of the day. McKenon responded, “In St. Kitts and Nevis, I worked from 7am-4pm and in the evening I could relax by playing a game of cricket with my friends.”
When my grandfather arrived in England, not having any family there he had to live with a friend named Wesley Carthy. With only a high school education and few skills in carpentry, McKenon settled down and tried to find work in England. Like other West Indian immigrants’ reasons for emigrating to Great Britain, my grandfather’s reasons was the overpopulation, high unemployment rates in his native island, and the doors were closed for the United States at the time (Peach 3). After the post World War II era, the United States legislation proposed the McCarran-Walter Immigration Act of 1952 where it only set a quota of 100 West Indian nations to enter the country (Dinnerstein 100). McKenon’s primary reason for coming to Great Britain was its unlimited employment opportunities in finding a job. Since it was after World War II, the United Kingdom was left in devastation from bombings that had destroyed many buildings (Peach 3). The high employment rate helped McKenon and other immigrants find jobs in factories or construction. According to his account of employment in England, my grandfather stated that “England was full of work. My first job was in a factory named Imperial Chemical Industry where they discovered the new chemical called titanium for making airplane engines. I worked in this factory for about 15 years where there were alternate shifts such as I would do the night shift one week and the day shift the next week.”
While my grandfather was living in the United Kingdom, Shirley Henderson, his girlfriend, made an expedition to visit him in April 1958. They both knew each other since living in St. Kitts and Nevis. The main reason for Shirley’s expedition to England was to marry McKenon and start their family together in Birmingham. Three years before Shirley arrived in the U.K., it was difficult for McKenon to find housing because the English residents did not want to rent or sell their homes to black immigrants. They were racist toward the black people because they were different from them and afraid to open their doors to foreigners. It took about two months for McKenon to find a house for his newlywed wife.
McKenon and Shirley got married in July 1958. In February 1959, Avalin, my mother, was the first child to be born to my grandparents. After Avalin’s birth, my grandparents had two more children Shaun and Sharene. The Francis family spent fifteen years in the United Kingdom before deciding to come to America. As McKenon recalls, “I decided to bring my family to the United States because they were now opening their doors to West Indian immigrants and there was higher paying jobs in America compared to England,” According to historian Holger Henke, the McCarran-Walter Immigration Act of 1952 was abolished in 1965, thus triggering a new wave of migration that marked a notable turning point in the history of Caribbean-American migration in America (Henke 28). This law had an impact on my grandparent’s decision of first immigrating to England and then coming to the U.S. They did not plan to stay long in England because they had relatives in America where they could form a family community for their children. The United States Immigration Act of 1965 allowed many West Indian immigrants enter the country by the following requirements which was they either had to have close relatives of U.S. residents or they were refugees from communist goverments (Dinnerstein 104). Sarah Browne, my grandfather’s older sister, sponsored his family to enter the United States in 1968.
On November 16, 1968 at 12pm in John F Kennedy airport of New York City, the Francis family finally arrived in America. They came only with four suitcases to start their new life because they had to sell their old home to pay for their expenses to this country. Compared to his arrival in Great Britain, McKenon had relatives and friends in America that he and his family could stay with before living on their own. They spent two weeks with his sister, who helped find an apartment in Brooklyn. Similar to other West Indian immigrant families, the Francis family moved into a four-family apartment building on East 95th Street in East Flatbush. East Flatbush was beginning to have a great West Indian community during this time. Just like his early days in England, he had to find employment and quality education for his three children. McKenon remembered that he had to place the children in their zone school, which was the educational system of placing children in their neighborhood school.
Avalin was placed in P.S. 219 where they were a large number of Jewish and Italian students with very few Hispanic and West Indian students. Majority of the teachers in the school were Jewish women who were racist to the newly arrived black immigrants. Avalin experienced discrimination at a young age, “I was 9 years old when I came to America and the school children were very cruel to me because of my British accent and how I dressed. I also felt the school teacher did not help me adapt to the American school system,” Avalin recalls her experience in school. It also took her a long time to grow accustomed to American culture. For example, when my mother first encountered pizza, a popular American takeout food, she was disgusted because it reminded her of vomit on bread. As she got older, she assimilated to different American foods and the words they used to describe certain things. She was still use to British English spellings and words compared to Standard American English. Avalin had to adjust to several traditions and customs before she saw herself as a true American.
After living in America for about two months, my mother, grandfather, and grandmother had different viewpoints about the lifestyles of the U.S.:
Avalin: Although I was 9 years old, I remembered viewing America as small and
dirty because I had to live in an apartment which I was not used to living
in. In England, there was countryside for me to run around and America
did not have any backyards when you live in a small apartment.
McKenon: It was strange to me because the houses were different compared to
England. These houses were know as apartments because each floor had a
set of rooms for each family. I dislike the apartments because I was not
accustomed to them.
Shirley: It was a big comparison because the streets were dirty and the apartments
were a different housing style. The weather was different from England
meaning when it was cold in America, it was really cold.

For the first six weeks of living in the U.S., McKenon worked in a plastic factory in Queens until his immigration papers arrived. He found a new job working with a banking company called Banker’s Trust in New York City. He worked with this company for 25 years as a check processor and distributor until he retired. While on the job, he experienced discrimination from the elite white upper-class men who received higher pay than the blacks. McKenon explains, “The harder jobs received less money because they could not find anyone to do them, so they gave them to the black people. I received many of those hard jobs which had low paying salaries, but I gained a lot of experience from them.” Although he was assigned more difficult jobs, it did not discourage him from trying to make a living for his family. One thing that he promised his children was that they would eventually have a better job than him by pursuing a college degree.
Just like McKenon, Shirley had to find employment in America to support her family. Her first job was in a shipping agency where she did secretarial work. After two years, she worked at Chemical Bank as an analyst in the banking department. While working there, she faced discrimination on the job where certain employees were given low paying salaries. She says, “Although I was given certain jobs with the low paying salaries, it was an eye-opener for me because America is not always the land of opportunity.” Like other West Indian immigrants, Shirley thought this country was built on liberty and democracy for every individual regardless of economic status. Although my grandmother only had a high school diploma from St. Kitts, she continued to work hard to receive the higher paying positions that whites held. Whites were able to find jobs more easily than other racial groups because the majority of the staff at these top companies was white.
While my grandparents were adjusting to their jobs in America, my mother was adapting to the education system in Brooklyn. She attended South Shore High School which was an all-white high school with a black population of ten percent. Avalin experienced discrimination daily from the white students when she wanted to join student organizations and activities. She remembers, “They would make it very difficult to join a club because they didn’t want black students in majority of the organizations. I participated in very few clubs due to their prejudice remarks about blacks.” Throughout her four years at South Shore, she disliked the student atmosphere that her only focus was to graduate in 1977. McKenon and Shirley took their children’s education very strongly and encourage them to attend college after high school. Like many West Indian parents, they saw education as a social mobility to survive in the U.S.
On November 20, 1980, the Francis family became official U.S. citizens. My grandfather remembered taking a citizenship test which consisted of all kinds of questions that related to U.S. history and math. Although he found it quite difficult, he managed to pass it and received his citizenship. Since his children had attended American schools, it was easier for them to pass and become citizens. This was a major turning point for the family because they weren’t seen as immigrants and did not have to show their papers whenever they filed taxes or decided to buy a house.
After my mother graduated from high school, she was given the opportunity to attend Hunter College in Manhattan. In those days, a college education was inexpensive because financial aid helped pay my mother’s college tuition. Unlike South Shore High School, there was a larger population of minority groups such as Asians, Hispanics, Indians, and Blacks. Avalin enjoyed her college experience at Hunter because it was the first time she didn’t experience discrimination from the white race. In 1982, Avalin was the first person in the Francis family to graduate with a bachelor of arts in Mass Media Communications and find a job at Merrill Lynch as a dividend broker. McKenon and Shirley were very proud of their daughter and decided to have a graduation party for her. They invited family and friends in the neighborhood to their new house on Brooklyn Avenue in Flatbush. After all these years in America, the family was able to own a house in a white neighborhood. The house had belonged to an Italian family who decided to sell it and move to Long Island.
The same year my mother became a citizen, my father Humphrey Bethel arrived in the States. He came during the third largest West Indian migration during the 1980s. Humphrey came from Petit Martinique, Grenada and was the first family member in the Bethel family to arrive in New York legally. While living in Grenada, he managed to save money from his boat industry to pay for the plane ticket to New York. Upon his arrival, he stayed with his uncle’s family in Brooklyn where they provided him with food and shelter. Like McKenon’s immigrant experience, Humphrey had to search for employment that would accept his high school education. He finally found a job in carpentry because he had great hand skills when it came to building things. Back in Grenada, he worked as boatman where he fixed and sold boats so fixing cabinets and doing woodwork was simple to him. Although my father was a light-skin West Indian immigrant, he encountered discrimination and prejudice remarks from his Jewish and Italians employers. After working at the carpentry ship for five years, he found employment at Gem Pawnbrokers in Flatbush. He continues to work at Gem today and is one of the head managers at this company.
In 1983, Humphrey and Avalin met at a concert in Brooklyn College. At this time, my father was pursuing a degree in Accounting at the college and would later drop out due to the expenses and family situations. When they began dating, McKenon and Shirley didn’t approve of the relationship because of Humphrey’s religion, nationality, and he had a child from a previous relationship. McKenon and Shirley were Methodist that took their family and church beliefs very serious. They wanted Avalin to find an educated college man and someone of their same religion. Humphrey was Catholic and wasn’t quite as religious as the Francis family. He was trying to pursue a college degree, but the expenses and his employment at Gem interfered with his education. He also had a son in Trinidad that he had to help support with money and clothes.
Finally with McKenon and Shirley approval, Humphrey and Avalin married on May 11th, 1985. During the first year of marriage, they lived with Humphrey’s uncle, Roderick Deroche on East 29th Street in Brooklyn. The newlywed couple was searching for an apartment where they can place their new family. On February 25th, 1986, I was born at Brookdale Hospital in East Flatbush. My grandfather decided to help the new family by giving them an apartment in the four-family building that he now own on East 95th Street. My family would reside there for fourteen years before moving to a new house. Then on February 28, 1989, my brother Gervase was born and the same year my father’s sister Mary Bethel came to live with us. In the beginning, my mother and she didn’t get along because of their different beliefs in family and traditions. She believed that West Indian traditions of music and food should surround the children so they do not forget my father’s native island. Since my mother grew up in America, she has already assimilated into American culture and food.
My father instilled his West Indian culture into my brother and I by exposing us to popular West Indian music and foods. Both of my parents would tell us how important an education is in this country because it is the only source of survival. My father would always say, “The standard of living in this country is based on your educational accomplishments. Make sure you pursue a college education even if I have to break my back to pay for it. I want my children to only have what I didn’t have in life which is the best.”
However, my father wasn’t the only person to instill his West Indian culture in my sibling and I. My grandparents would tell us their stories from the island and encourage us to go back to visit the island every year. Since Brooklyn has a great West Indian presence, my mother would take us to the annual West Indian American Day Parade on Eastern Parkway because the Brooklyn carnival is an important tool for creating ethnic identity in the U.S. and marks the presence of West Indians from various countries. I have attended the parade almost every year and it has helped me embrace my West Indian heritage by joining the Caribbean Students Associations in my school.
As a second generation immigrant, I understand the struggles and hardships that my grandparents dealt with when arriving in this country. From the time the U.S. set a quota of 100 West Indian immigrants which became known as Mc-Carren Walter Immigration Act of 1952, this hinder my grandparents decisions to enter America directly. Even though the immigration system in America has changed, new immigrants experience the same feelings of disappointment and suffering by the existence of racial discrimination. Compared to previous West Indian immigrants in the 1920s, my grandparents and parents didn’t have any problems with African Americans because they settled in the West Indian area of New York. Unlike early West Indian immigrants, they did not settle in Harlem, but in East Flatbush, Brooklyn. They did not have any distinct differences with African American such as religion, customs, or traditions (Osofsky 136-137). Similar to early West Indian immigrants, my grandparents and parents did encounter racism from many Jews and Italians on the job and in their neighborhoods. Majority of Jewish women became teachers and taught in the New York City schools (Binder 116). In my early elementary school years, Jewish teachers made up a large population in the school atmosphere and some had their prejudice against my fellow classmates. I have lived in this country all my life and I still feel that prejudice and racism has affected my life. Although it is not such a big issue as before, it continues to exist in my neighborhood, at school, and at work. I have made my grandparents’ proud by getting an education in a country that took a long journey to arrive here.















Works Cited
Bethel, Avalin. Personal Interview. 30 Nov. 2005
Bethel, Humphrey. Personal Interview. 20 Apr. 2006
Binder, Frederick M. & Reimers, David M. All the Nations Under Heaven. New York: Columbia University Press, 1995: 116
Dinnerstein, Leonard & Reimers, David M. Ethnic Americans: A History of Immigration. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1988: 100,104
Francis, McKenon. Personal Interview. 3 Dec. 2005
Francis, Shirley. Personal Interview. 4 Dec. 2005
Henke, Holger. The West Indian Americans. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2001: 28
Osofsky. Harlem: The Making of a Ghetto.
Peach, Ceri. West Indian Migration to Britain. London: Oxford Press, 1968: 3

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Religion in School Controversy

The debate of whether or not religion should be taught in school is one that is seeped in controversy. As Alexis de Tocqueville once quipped, “America’s political problems eventually become its legal ones, so do America’s moral questions.” Unfortunately, the issue of religion in school trickles down to children and the schools that they attend. With that in mind, the questions that beg to be asked are” should schools teach morality, if so, whose morality? Should they be forced to recite the pledge of allegiance? Should creationism be incorporated into scientific textbooks?
Our country’s moral dilemmas are displayed daily on television and print. The tragic deaths of the Columbine high school students and the terrorist attacks of September 11th took on renewed religious urgency. To some, these events provided evidence that there is in fact a need to reinstate public school devotionals that sends a message of approval for prayer. Millions of Americans turned to God for comfort and salvation to obtain deeper meaning of those events. Government-led prayer led to criticism, including those in public schools which were equated with a lack of sympathy towards victims and survivors. Such patriotic fervor needs closer examination especially when preachers such as Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson suggest that the sins of insufficiently religious persons have led an exasperated deity to withdraw his protection, thus exposing America to terrorist attack.
Religion and national identity tend to go hand in hand in America especially in the wake of the 9/11 aftermath. Public schools also became a point of controversy involving the post-9/11 use of the term “God Bless America.” These three ubiquitous words filled churches, libraries and billboards. Many people objected to using those three words because of the many religions found in America and because of the inevitable danger that lurks when government and religion unite. The Columbine tragedy and the terrorist acts of 9/11 were not due to a tear in our country’s moral fiber but because of religious extremism.
Legislative measures have been implemented to reaffirm a secular vision of our society. The U.S. House of Representatives joined the fray by passing a nonbinding resolution: “That it is the sense of the Congress that public schools may display the words ‘God Bless America’ as an expression of support for the nation” (107th Congress, 1st Session, H. Con. Res. 248[2001]). As Delfattore (2004) stated, “Congress defended its resolution by stating that ‘God Bless America’ is not a religious sentiment but an affirmation of patriotism but failed to make a distinction between students’ rights to say ‘God Bless America’ and the schools’ right to post it” (p.307).
The fact that school-prayer cases appear on court calendars throughout the country lead to further questions: Have we as a nation progressed in resolving disagreements over religion in public schools? The answer is a tricky ‘yes and no.’
The difficulty in answering what is meant by the American religious heritage is one that polarizes the debate over school prayer: those who want their children to join in a common prayer and those who favor equal access or no religion in schools. Many favor majority prayer to assimilate or “Americanize” incomers. While others oppose justifying a government/state sponsored notion to promote any specific religious tradition. Teaching our students about the founding fathers’ religion and the role they played in this nation, is part of the disagreement over a common American religious tradition. Conservatives feel that our founding fathers’ traditions should not be altered the outcome, meanwhile, is that the beliefs of immigrants become marginalized. The equal-access approach has united parties from both camps including those who favor government sponsored prayer and those who oppose all prayer in schools.
It is difficult to escape the debate over beliefs that so many people hold while trying to come to a definitive resolution. As Berason (2006) states, “religious guarantees operate at two levels: at the institutional or structural level in the case of non-establishment; and at the individual and libertarian level in the case of free exercise. They are not like ships passing in the night, but rather like ships following the same general course but that occasionally meet requiring one to give right-of-way to the other” (p.277). Educators must be dynamic in their approach towards religion and “inform themselves of the religious groups in their community and in their school” (Gollnick and Chinn, p.281). Religious belief is in constant flux, it ebbs and flows from conservative to liberal depending on socio-political climate of the day. Religion and schools are not always mutually exclusive but respect and acceptance must be promoted by educators. Promoting acceptance can create a balance between the realm of politics and theology.

Works Cited

Bezanson, R. (2006). How Free Can Religion Be? University OF Illinois Press.

Delfattore, J. (2004). The Fourth R: Conflicts Over Religion in America’s Public Schools. Yale University Press.

Dierenfield, B. (2007). The Battle Over School Prayer. University of Kansas.

Gollnick, D., and Chinn, P., (2008). Multicultural Education in a Pluralistic Society. Eighth Edition, Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Approaching Religious Diversity in Schools

The role of schools and educators in students’ lives is complex and all encompassing. Included in this role, is the task of equipping students to become citizens who are able to and will participate and effectively contribute to a liberal democracy and society. In order for this to occur, the education priced to students must include understanding all aspects of diversity and the diversity of their fellow students and citizens. This diversity encompasses a wide spectrum, including racial, culturally, ethnic, and religious diversity. Providing students with the opportunity to learn about such diversity is particularly important when diversity spurns conflict about how people live together in a society, locally and globally (Kunzman, 2006). In light of the recent events surrounding our involvement in the Middle East, including the events of September 11, the need to teach students and foster understanding of religious diversity has sailed to the forefront of essential issues. The problems that many educators face, especially in public schools, is how to teach religious diversity in general as well as how to do so while staying in the confines of the law.
A vital element of diversity and recently, conflict, is religion. According to the American Religious Identification Survey, 73% of Americans identified themselves as “somewhat religious” and “religious” (American Religious Identification Survey, 2001). While the majority of the population of the United States is Catholic or Protestant, religious diversity in the United States continues to grow (Kunzman, 2006). Because of this fact, schools need to help students to understand religious diversity and foster acceptance between individual students. By doing so, students will be able to better understand the current conflicts surrounding religion in the United States as well as globally. This task is not an easy one, as it requires educators to present religion to students in such as way that will provide students with insight into the lives of others, hopefully encouraging a respect for other members of society, starting with the other students in the classroom.
While it is clear what the role of educators is, the application of such a task can extremely difficult for various reasons. The issue of what is appropriate when teaching religion in the classroom is addressed by law. According to May (2006), there is a distinct difference between religious activity and religious instruction. Religious activity constitutes teaching students that the aspects of one religion are true and should be followed while religious instruction constitutes teaching about religion, such as the beliefs different denominations have and what members believe.
According to the U.S. Department of Education (2008), religious activity is strictly prohibited in the classroom and teachers are also prohibited from discouraging activity because of its religious content or encouraging any anti-religious activity. Teaching about religion, especially religious diversity can be very difficult when having to do so within these strict guidelines. Wagner and Benavante-McEnery (2008) offer the insight that by limiting the amount of “God talk” by students in the classroom, educators are actually inhibiting the self-expression of the students in the classroom. Silencing “God talk” sometimes happens in classrooms, as many teachers fear that too much exploration into this topic would welcome some sort of redress. Unfortunately, while teachers are following the guidelines set out for them, they are sometimes discouraging open and direct inquiry (Wagner & Benavente-McEnery, 2008).
In order to teach religious diversity in the classroom, there are certain approaches educators can pursue that fall within the guidelines as well as provide students with engaging material that does indeed foster inquiry. Educators need to not only teach students the factual aspects of different religions, but allow them to explore the religions more independently. Students need not agree with everything they find or learn, but they should respect all perspectives, regardless of how different those perspectives are from their own. An important element of teaching religious diversity is to introduce the idea of “different” not with a negative connotation, but as an essential and beneficial part of the makeup of the United States. Students are often presented with the idea of tolerance and acceptance at an early age, but usually in terms of race and cultural. Due to the increasing religious pluralism in the U.S., religious tolerance and diversity needs to be introduced to students as early as possible (Wagner & Benavente-McEnery, 2008).
It is the responsibility of educators to teach religious diversity to students in order to prepare them to be influential citizens, who are equipped with the knowledge and understanding necessary to succeed. This task includes teaching students about religious diversity. By downplaying its importance because of the tight confines placed upon teaching about religion in the classroom, educators are doing a serious disservice to students, who need to be aware of how to navigate the conflicts caused by religion in a global society. By allowing students to explore different religions, encouraging inquiry, and introducing religious acceptance at an early stage, effectively teaching religious diversity in the classroom can become a reality.

Kosman, B., Mayer, E., & Kosman, A. (2001). The American Religious Identification Survey. The Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Retrieved October 18, 2008, from http://www.gc.cuny.edu/faculty/research_briefs/aris.pdf

Kunzman, R. (2006). Imaginative engagement with religious diversity in public schools classrooms. Religious Education, 101(4), 516-531.

May, C. (2006). Religion’s legal place in the schoolhouse. School Administrator, 63(9), 30-34.

U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Religious expression in public schools 2003.
Retrieved October 18, 2008, from
http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/religionandschools/prayer_guidance.html

Wagner, P. & Benavente-McEnery, L. (2008). Genuine religious olerance: Is it a thing of the
past in public schools? Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 39(3), 327-350.

Copyright and Permissions

This blog is copyrighted by King, K. P., Bethel, T., Dery, V., Foley, J., Griffith-Hunte, C., Guerrero, M., Lasalle-Tarantin, M., Menegators, J., Meneilly, K., Patterson, S., Peters, S., Pina, A., Ritchie, D., Rudzinki, L., Sandiford, D., & Sarno, I., 2008.


Information herein may only be used with full attribution. Commercial use is denied without contacting and receiving license for doing so from matilto:kpking@fordham.edu Academic use, not-for-profit use is allowed with full recognition for the source and credit given to King, K. P., Bethel, T., Dery, V., Foley, J., Griffith-Hunte, C., Guerrero, M., Lasalle-Tarantin, M., Menegators, J., Meneilly, K., Patterson, S., Peters, S., Pina, A., Ritchie, D., Rudzinki, L., Sandiford, D., & Sarno, I. for the original work.